Exactly how much can you tell about a person from a portrait photograph?
There was a feature on sky news a day or so ago about celebrity photographer Rankin, he has a new project underway which will feature “normal” people as a kind of photographic representation of the population of the UK. It was really interesting hearing his take on portrait photography; that the camera always lies. People want to see a flattering likeness of themselves that will please them not have them running for a plastic surgeon, so in which case how realistic a representation of a person can a portrait photo be?This is the dilemma with photography. I aim to produce photos that my clients will be pleased with, if I didn’t I’d be swiftly looking for another way to pay my mortgage! But if photos are enhanced (by good camera angles and flattering lighting) and subjects are enhanced with professional hair and make-up, it’s an immediate distortion of reality. It doesn’t represent the face in the mirror first thing in the morning, but would anyone want to have their photo taken at 7am?
So in order to get a true representation of a person, it’s the photographer’s job to draw out their subject’s personality. Good interpersonal skills are required to capture a cheeky look, a silly face or more sombre emotion and being able to snap these fleeting moments is what makes a good portrait. So a photograph of someone can only represent what they were thinking and feeling at the moment the photo was taken, a slice of time in between the reality of day to day life and 7am starts.
Labels: portrait, portrait photography, portraits





